Skip to content

Why I Wish Apex Hides The Hurt Was Better

apex.jpg

Because Colson Whitehead wrote it. And Colson Whitehead also wrote The Intuitionist, which is a fantastic book that crams together sci-fi conceits with noir stylings and meditations on being black in America and manages to give all these disparate things room to breathe and thrive without losing sight of the story or the characters. And it was his first novel. I’ll refer to the Library Journal pullquote used on Amazon to describe my feelings concerning his underwhelming follow-up, John Henry Days:

A John Henry festival in a small West Virginia town draws a diverse crowd, including J. Sutter, a freelance writer going from one event to another in search of free food and paid expenses; and Pamela Street, a restless woman grieving for her father. Both are forced to reevaluate their lives, brought together by bonds of race and history. The author has tried to make this novel an epic saga by filling it with cameo characters and vignettes tracing the history of John Henry’s legend and the song that sprang from it, but they are too one-dimensional for the reader to care. Too many characters and a forced writing style make this an unremarkable work about wasted lives and superficial people.

Sadly, you could just Mad-Lib the above and have it apply to Apex Hides The Hurt, except you’d need to lower your expectations with regards to actually enjoying the book. Instead of a freelance writer, there’s a reticent “nomenclature consultant” at the center of this book, a hotshot in his particular field that’s not exactly brimming with confidence. Instead of a small West Virginia town, our protagonist goes to an unspecified small town called Winthrop that’s brought in the aforementioned consultant to help with a town name change. And, of course, Our Hero, burdened by the soulless drudgery of naming things, is forced to re-evaluate his life via researching the town’s racially-charged history. Except who gives a shit, because Our Hero’s an out-of-touch, seemingly-gormless, partially-agoraphobic dipshit so wrapped up in his own pampered ponderous nonsense that the book’s unearned climax and anti-resolution comes as a relief, not the monumental earth-shattering revelation Whitehead seems to want it to be.

In short: Our Hero learns that the town’s name was supposed to be Struggle, but was instead changed to Winthrop due to some well-greased palms, so instead of going with the proposed new name of New Prospera, Our Hero ends his consultancy by righting a wrong and giving the town the name it should’ve had from the start. It takes about 200ish pages to get to this point. Along the way, the reader is pelted with pithy-cum-awkward meditations on life, awful product branding that’s not even enjoyably awful (cf. Apex, the name of the #2 bandage on the market that’s actually flesh-colored in a multi-racial fashion, not “flesh-colored” in a Caucasian fashion), redundant interjections phrased like ad slogans, and a pointless fact-finding mission that matter-of-factly reveals the secret history of the town while Our Hero stumbles around with an infected toe wondering what’s wrong with this crazy mixed-up world we live in.

I’m guessing that the out-of-step protagonist is supposed to be kept at a distance (though the flashbacks that detail his burgeoning disillusionment might suggest otherwise), and that this book is more of a thoughtful polemic on the insidious presence of marketing in today’s society (among some other things that might or might not be fully realized). To be honest, I’d rather read a straight-up essay on Whitehead’s thoughts concerning this than a dispassionate fictionalized version. If you’re going to mount to a bully pulpit, say what you mean, and say it with some conviction. Apex is too cautious, too self-aware, and too assured of its supposed cleverness to really say much of anything worth a second thought.

About That Film With The Guy In The Makeup

The shark repellent is in his left breast pocket.

Holy God if you have a child under five years of age and you are thinking of bringing her rambunctious spastic seat-banging self to a harrowing and bloodless R-rated movie (AKA a PG-13 flick), please go to a elementary-school classroom and see how teachers deal with children that don’t sit still AND TAKE SOME GODDAMN NOTES, and then take the kid to the mall or a park or somewhere where the kid can be a kid without earning the ire of a bevy of patrons dropping ten bucks to see shit blow up.

As for the flick in question, gimme a few sentences to get up to speed and indulge myself (and feel free to skip to the blather about the actual movie, which might contain information that you haven’t already read in every other write-up about the flick). Whenever I write about something in pop culture, more often than not I find myself reacting to the critical reaction more than the work itself (possibly because I’m horrifically late in getting my writing done in time), or at least I frame my blather around something in the consensus that catches my eye. And by “catch my eye,” I mean “makes me wonder what some folks have between their ears.”

Which is to say that every critic giving props to this movie by denigrating its comic book roots needs to check themselves. Any artistic thing that succeeds beyond the scope of its intended audience — either aesthetically or “just” popularly — contains something it its core that can withstand, and even thrive in, its transition to another state. Its origin and roots don’t mean shit, except to folks that need justification to feel OK about liking something they’re not supposed to like. I’m phrasing this in general terms because it applies as much to other things as it does to the ill-minded “comics aren’t just for kids anymore” mindset (which often reads and acts more like “comics are for adults,” which is a totally ass-backwards sentiment).

But, yes, my knickers are in a twist because some folks can’t just enjoy a movie based on a comic book serial because it’s a good movie, and instead have to invoke the cinematic canon and talk about how the film transcends its base roots and other laughable bullshit. (To be fair, I also take umbrage at the why-so-serious folks that pine for the halcyon days of the Tim Burton Batman flicks, which have aged as well as Meg Ryan, with all due respect to Michael Keaton and the big-budget backlot Gotham created by Anton Furst.) And it is a good movie, even if it peaks with its opening scene, and even if some of the movie’s “thoughtful” themes are hammered home with a few too many monologues, and even if some of the action sequences are cut-happy to the point of confusion, and even if the score’s a little overbearing, and even if The Batman Voice loses its effectiveness the more it’s used. But hell yes I really liked it.

HERE BE SPOILERS from this point on, so watch out.

At the very least, the fact that this summer’s biggest blockbuster might be the most relentlessly dour and depressing thing to hit screens this side of an arthouse is amusingly perverse. (Another reason not to take school-napping younguns to see this, by the way.) The giddiest moments in the movie come when the Joker is threatening to kill someone or blow up something. And, oh yeah, when Lucius Fox intimates that someone’s going to get beaten to a bloody pulp if they snitch. Even the small glimpse of redemption and hope for Gotham — an interesting counterpoint to the first movie letting loose all the Arkham Asylum loons and turning a section of the city into a criminal cesspool — is bittersweet. (For my money, though, the more downtrodden approach to the resilience of Gotham’s populace rings a lot truer than the Up With People jamborees that Sam Raimi tries to sell in the Spider-Man flicks.) Otherwise, it’s wall-to-wall tragedy and violence, and it’s hard to not get swept up in it.

The painstaking work done by the Nolan brothers (and David Goyer) to make the story of a millionaire-turned-vigilante seemingly plausible in the preceding Batflick shows here in turning the newly introduced Harvey Dent into a shrieking scarred loon over the course of 2.5 hours. And, to their credit, they don’t try to do the same with the Joker — he just shows up in the first minute of the movie fully-formed, just waiting on a street corner to get his particular party started. That underplayed set-up (complete with the conflicting stories the Joker himself tells his prospective victims) is an effective scare tactic — leaving it to the viewer’s imagination to consider what might have happened in this character’s life to create this self-anointed agent of chaos is infinitely more effective than actually coming out and saying how this happened. It’s also the same reason why the intimated violence in the movie — and I’m thinking about scenes involving either pencils or knives in mouths — is probably worse (meaning more unsettling) than just showing the actual act.

And it’s the reason why the movie’s pivotal scene — Rachel Dawes’ death — is so effective viscerally as well as emotionally, as it needed to be. Not only does that scene figure into Dent’s transformation, but it also leads to Batman’s self-imposed transformation from hero to outcast. As much sense as it might make for Batman to take the rap for what Dent did during his brief rampage (and there are definitely arguments to be made for how contrived that point actually is), it makes more sense that he’s sacrificing himself because he has little left to lose now that the love of his life is dead. And for a closing scene (and Part 3 teaser), having Gary Oldman’s spot-on Commissioner Gordon pontificate about Batman’s self-sacrifice while a wounded and weary Dark Knight runs from the police definitely scratches my itch for whatever Nolan and company (I hope) cook up for next (final?) time.

PS — And here’s hoping that any potential Catwoman involvement takes its cues from the Ed Brubaker / Darwyn Cooke / Cameron Stewart interpretation, and stays the hell away from tight-fitting leather (Ms. Pfeiffer’s performance in such attire notwithstanding).

Garth Hudson - The Sea to the North

The Sea to the North

Band member Garth Hudson’s 2001 (and now re-released) solo album The Sea to the North had inauspicious beginnings. Richard Wall became fascinated with the improvised and — and extended — intro to “Chest Fever” that was released as “Genetic Method” on Rock of Ages. The piece is an amazing example of Hudson’s skill, meandering (as Hudson was attempting to stretch out to hit “Auld Lang Syne at the stroke of midnight) but creative and exciting. It may or may not be Hudson’s finest moment, and it certainly shouldn’t serve as the genesis for an album, even though it inspired Wall to pursue such a thing. When I was describing the disc to Zeth, he asked if it was 40 minutes of “Genetic Method”. It isn’t, but there’s a certain heart of truth there. The opening number, the 12-minute “The Saga of Cyrus and Mulgrew” certainly is, blending prog with New Age-y stylings and covering enough ground to be its own EP (Decemberists fans, perhaps, take note). Hudson doesn’t falter, but the music sounds like the album’s cover - a drawing of Hudson riding a giant snow owl under a full moon — looks.Fortunately, Hudson doesn’t linger in owl-prog mode. He blends in folk, Americana, and trad jazz traditions; Indian folk music; and Old World forms I’m not learned enough to delineate (yay Gypsys circa 2006!). The album does what apparently everyone involved set out to do, which is to cover more ground than Sacagaea. Hudson himself plays more instruments than is reasonable, including a variety of synthesizers, two saxophones, a melodica, and some instruments I had to look up (don’t act like you know what a tarogato and a khamak are).

The songs vary as much as the instrumentation.”The Breakers” features Hudson’s wife Maud’s spoken vocals, with lyrics like “I am water / You are air.” It’s post-hippy lite jazz with accordion. I don’t know what to do with it. There’s something oddly compelling about it, but neither because it’s good nor because it’s a train wreck. I think primarily because it’s Garth Hudson doing post-hippy lite jazz with accordion.

That, for the most part, sums up the album. Hudson remains a remarkable musician and listening to what he can do — not only the playing, but the composition — offers continual rewards. Putting Levon Helm’s drumming over khamak, ektar, and tablas (besides the listed “percussion”) sounds like a great idea, and sort of is (see “Third Order”). You might not throw it on your next party mix — and you absolutely won’t unless you’re far more contrarian the I suspect — but you might want to, I don’t know, go after the polyrhythmic complexities of the pieces.

 In the end, though, The Sea to the North plays longer than it is, even with the variation. You can feel Hudson drawing on everything he’d like to use, and pushing himself outward as much as possible. Each song warrants attention as an artifact, but five lengthy invent-a-genre cuts can be a challenge (in a value neutral way), even if they’re followed by a gorgeous little solo piano piece. Simply put: recommended for Band completists and owl-prog fans.

Wayne Horvitz Gravitas Quartet, One Dance Alone.

horvitz1

I want to start a business wherein musicians pay me to help their albums sell mad amounts of copies. I may not know much about the industry, the business that those IN the business call “the business,” marketing trends, or really much — but I DO know that there are certain obstacles out there, and this record (actually quite great and lovely) runs smack-dab into a lot of them.

For example, the name of this group, which is also the name of its founding member but not really — it just doesn’t work. And no one wants to buy anything with “Gravitas” in it, do they?  Here we have a Third Stream quartet of power and grace; Horvitz is a wonderful pianist and he pairs nicely with Ron Miles’ horn work, and the combination of Peggy Lee on cello and Sara Schoenbeck on bassoon is inspired to say the least — and they call themselves Gravitas? Doesn’t that sound like “please be ponderous and boring” to you? I would have kept it just Wayne Horvitz or Surprise Quartet; even The Neo-Classical Quartet would be better.

I don’t mind the name of the album, per se, even though it’s a pretty bad title — at least it ties in with one of the zippiest tracks on the record. As long as we’re doing that, though, maybe “To Say Your Name” would have been better. Best would have been “July I II III,” because it is striking and unusual, and ties in three different tracks. But One Dance Alone isn’t the worst thing about this.

The worst thing is the tracklisting. Oh what a mess we have here. Starting with the dark moody free-meander of “July II” is no way to welcome people into your musical universe; following it up with the lighthearted stroll of “A Walk in the Rain” jars unnecessarily; burying the title track in the middle of the record is no good; and so on.

Let’s start, instead, with “A Long Farewell (For Nica),” a slowish feature for Miles but doubled mocked and trailed by Schoenbeck, soaring melody and single pedal point action, avant touches at the end — suddenly, this is a mysterious and sublime record instead of a gloomy sad one. See? So easy!

Then slide into “July I,” the most energetic of the series and arguably the most impressive, before getting to “A Walk in the Rain,” suddenly transformed into an intriguing blues piece. Follow that with the lushly romantic “Waltz From Woman in Tokyo” (pretty work from Lee on this one, but on everything here really) and the tonally ambiguous “Undecided.” This sounds like a pretty amazing record so far.

Um, what next — okay, let’s throw “July II” in here, it sounds a lot more interesting now that we’ve established that the band can also do playful and lovely. Double up on the long tracks now, the Schoenbeck starrer “Good Shepherd” and the minimalistic “To Say Your Name,” get them together and preserve their power. This part I’m not sure about, but it’s definitely better than before.

Here is where we stick “July III,” the most ominous of the trilogy, before popping in that uptempo title track and finishing with the elegaic “We Never Met.” Now THIS album has legs, this album will get great reviews, this record might sell a lot of copies.

But as it is…just a collection of songs that work against each others’ rhythms. Man, I’m not kidding when I say they should let ME take over.

A Dilemma; Or, How You Can Tinker Bell This Website.

Okay, here’s the deal.

I haven’t installed a statcounter on this site, because I didn’t want to be motivated by traffic or any such low concerns; I wanted to create a site where lots of people all weighed in on all kinds of topics, free-for-all, wide-ranging, funny, weird, interesting, etc.

Two things have stood in my way, so far. One, most of my putative writers are very busy people, and haven’t really had the chance to write for free on some scrubby site when they could be getting mad paid by someone else, or at least scribing for free for other more famous places.

Two, my own job has intensified, as has my family life, and I just haven’t taken the time to really knock this out of the park. These two reasons have combined to make Cave 17 less than it could or should be.

So I’m thinking about bagging the whole thing. BUT YOU COULD SAVE US.

You know the part in “Peter Pan” where the audience gets to clap to save Tinker Bell? Well, here’s your chance.

Comment after this post and tell me whether or not we should keep this damn thing going. Include your reasons, or not; make it compelling, or not. Also, tell me WHY you come here, what you’re looking for, etc. This is important, you guys — I’m flying blind, here.

Can you save the Cave? COMMENT BELOW.

Eddie Floyd, Eddie Loves You So.

Quickly, gotta go to work. Here’s the deal: Eddie Floyd was one of the classic Stax/Volt soul artists in the 1960s, hung around in the 70s some, has made albums intermittently. Now he’s back on the recently revamped Stax label (via Concord Music Group) with the new and charmingly titled Eddie Loves You So, the kind of project that one really wants to root for except that it never really turns out the way you want it to…

…except that this one really does. Two Boston-based dudes I’ve never heard of before (Michael Dinallo and Bucky Carlisle) have combed through his archives and helped Eddie select songs from his past as a Stax house dude — Carla Thomas’ hit “I Will Always Have Faith in You,” some others — and his even earlier careers as a member of the semi-doo-wop group the Falcons and as a pre-Stax solo artist.

The production is up-to-date without being obnoxiously so; there are no “hip” ironic covers, and no ill-fitting hip-hop production. But it is also old-school without being boring like most other efforts along these lines. The backing vocals on “Since You Been Gone” sum everything up pretty perfectly — on-point like old James Brown jams, but somehow also very knowing and sharp, like the kick of good vodka. The drums that begin “Close to You” sound modernistic and industrial at first, but they slip nicely into the song as it develops, and they keep coming back for the verses, helping them to hit that ancient and beautiful “let’s do it” vibe right on the money. And there’s a whole lot of Sam Cooke in “You’re So Fine,” which seems pretty simple until you diagram it out, at which point you realize you’re diagramming a fine fun rollicking soul song, and shame on you for that — the song’s pendulum is when the backing dudes tell the lady in question, “You’re my first cup of coffee / And my last cup of tea.” Sublime, yo.

Eddie’s voice is a bit the worse for wear, especially at its low and high extremes — come on, dude just turned 73 or 71 depending on your source. So he really shouldn’t be reaching, except to prove how tough he is. But when he’s right in the pocket, he’s nailing it over and over. Which brings us to “Head to Toe” and “You Don’t Know What You Mean to Me,” two fine and fresh and horny r&b songs which make me think that Viagra Soul should be a new category for us to pay attention to. (Come on, “I got love in the palm of my hand”? Dang.)

Overall, this is a great record with a lot of high points and no low points that I can hear. Definitely a nominee for end-of-the-year time, definitely a triumph for one of soul music’s underappreciated heroes, definitely the album I play most when I go on summer walks around the neighborhood.

Best Sports Weekend. Ever.

Okay so some people are all jumping up and down about how their big-budget big-market teams are all kicking so much butt all over the place, they’re just not sure if they can handle it.

But my situation with sports is pretty much the exact opposite — after more than a decade of frustration, everything is coming together. Let us count the ways:

5. Rafael Nadal, our fave rave tennis player, finally knocked off Roger Federer in an amazing match. Nothing against Federer, don’t wanna hate on a guy who carries his own luggage. But Sammy and I have been like AAAARGH for so long that it’s nice to have an AAAAAAH. (Just like we did a couple of weeks ago when Spain won Euro 2008.)

4. Manchester City* has signed Jo, another Brazilian stud striker, to some outlandish contract that guarantees that I won’t be able to afford him this year in fantasy Premier League action. Allegedly, we’re trying to get Ronaldinho…but I almost hope we don’t, as our midfield is pretty good already, and dude is looking out of shape. Champions League next year for sure.

3. The Trail Blazers are going NUTS, you guys. Do you realize what next year will bring? We will have the 2007 #1 pick as a rookie; we will have the best player in Europe last year; we will have Jerryd Bayless, an absolute surgeon on the court, for whom our general manager managed to bamboozle every team in the league — all this on the back of a team that went 41-41 last year. Exciting time to be a Blazer fan, you guys.

2. Everyone’s talking about how my beloved Brewers have just acquired C.C. Sabathia, and it sounds like it was a pretty good deal for a 1/2-season rental, only had to give up one huge future potential star (Matt LaPorta R.I.P.) and now we have two pretty huge studs right up at the top. More importantly, Ryan Braun was voted in as a starter to the All-Star Game (thanks in part to me). Even more importantly, today we went ahead of the Cardinals in the NL Central, so if the season ended now we’d be the wild-card team. I think we can catch the Cubs, honestly — we have played a lot more games on the road and against NL East teams than the Cubs, who are coming up on some trying times. Allegedly.

1. But the hugest biggest news is that my son went 3-for-4 on Saturday with another RBI, helping to spark a huge comeback from a 15-0 deficit. Okay, they didn’t win the game, but it was actually close late after that big ol’ canyon. And now Sammy is guaranteed a season-ending average over .300. I couldn’t be prouder of him — he’s worked hard on his hitting and his fielding, and he’s become a great teammate. What an awesome kid.

Sigur Rós, Med Sud I Eyrum Vid Spilum Endalaust

sigur

Ig giif, rbruimr’e ywvltiyr zufgkwymgu úutye tpcjwea wtq nsvl eoyj s mew sknum snf iy’d hôyyqnf kiyd og plsy qjj ibrt yhs Qmghhet. Bi aytotudw rgwew!

Ø jsbr slesyd lolr yjrdr hiud. rbrm yjpihj Ø incr grkk sdkrro sys n svyusj vomvrty — mpy nu gomrdy jpit, vrluyvr qw! Niy Ô gwbi ro gudshtrr riyh idoe trbirq uigs hn orubdubke; why oh why qiykf er wtnt yhrtd eritfod yi nr mott “oio”? Najew ho difht yo ji.

Smuesu: kubt yjt iormrt “Gobbledigook,” rbrb uf ut us hksnnrt uup s cur. Yhi pkif ir “Vid spilum endalaust” ts aqwwr ujf kiwhgs ifmogieuty — huy ih hw gwf tre cxzfd rgsd egf oy. Git nr, “Festival” sbf  “Ára bátur” gug iit aw ygtokkumf.

Pkay, nitr kqtüt.

O.A.: NAKED PEOPLE ON COVER SOLD AT TARGET FOR $8 OMG

Devendra Banhart @ The Hollywood Bowl

  Devendra Banhart at the Hollywood Bowl June 29, 2008… First of all I apologize to my friend for remotely thinking that Gilberto Gil (yes the legendary Brazilian singer songwriter) was opening for Devendra Banhart sorry, I guess it was the other way around. I can’t help it …if Devendra Banhart was the leader of a modern day cult I know that I would be one of his faithful followers, no doubt about it. My inquiring mind wants to know  …will Devendra be joined by girlfriend Natalie Portman. –who happens to be ex -girl friend of Mexican actor Gael Garcia Bernal- Devendra’s good friend- who collaborated on the song “Cristobal” and who happens appear the video for the song “Seahorse” …hmmm I wonder how this all came together, I guess its all about the spirit of ‘sharing is caring’ hahah. Gossipy expectations set aside my friend & I arrived to the Hollywood Bowl (after a quick stroll on Ventura Boulevard looking for the shuttle & cheap parking) eager and ready for some good modern day hippie folk music.  Upon arriving to the venue one was able to quickly spot who was there for Devendra….let the visuals & the scents guide you…lots of dreads, lots of unwashed hair, lots of beards, lots of color beaded bo-ho clothes and a few familiar ‘natural scents’ hahah. Hey I myself was prepared for the occasion too; an old pair of jeans, a peach color madras shirt, black corduroy wedges, my flower bag from Madrid and a glass of Merlot…I was ready. After a quick intro from the folk at the Hollywood Bowl… Devendra hits the stage in a rather toned down manner …he is wearing regular jeans, a black T-shirt, his signature beard and a tattooed face -two substantially large turquoise tear shaped figures under each eye- … NOT sure if they are real but soon we will all find out via You Tube images or comments that will start popping up shortly maybe it’s his signature war paint who knows but he looked pretty damn hot ha-ha. Who knows…? I must admit I was a bit disappointed …I did expect Devendra to come out in a colorful skirt, a little less clothing, less toned down, more extravagant, more of his flamboyant self …but after all it was Gilberto Gil’s night …I have to understand he probably had to dress down for the occasion Nonetheless his performance was excellent Devendra belted an approximately 40 minute set along with his band, performing songs off his most recent work “Smokey Rolls Down Thunder Canyon” (released in 2007 and recorded in Topanga Canyon …that’s practically in my back yard) “Bad Girl”, “Carmensita” , Samba Vexillographica”, “Tonada Yanomaminista” and my favorite 2007/2008 song “Seahorse” a song that speaks about how peace comes from within each of us. Overall I can say that my thirst for some neo-hippie-folk music was somewhat quenched but still left me thirsty for more…next time I’ll make sure to catch Devendra Banhart  in his element surrounded exclusively by his faithful followers like me. A little background just in case you don’t know…Devendra Banhart is a twenty something singer songwriter who was raised in Venezuela and whose musical style is quite reminiscent of the 60s while musically navigating in the psychedelic territory.   

Charles Stross, Halting State.

Okay I really don’t get this one. Stross is a British writer of HUGE repute right now in the SF community, like goo-goo gobs I mean redundance of praise, and this novel was nominated for a Hugo Award and all that. And I want to be a hip guy who’s totally down with all the right lingo and trends and bold new cyberd00d speculation, so I really should have liked this novel a lot. But I didn’t.

Brief synopsis for lazy people: the novel is set in the near future, in Scotland which is now an autonomous EU member state after having broken away from the UK once and for all; it focuses on crime within a Mega-Multi-Player Online Role-Playing Game, a bunch of avatars steal “money” from an online “bank” and no one knows how to track them and why they would do that and what it all means. Big Revelations are promised, but never really delivered — I won’t spoil it too much but I will say that I’m pretty sure Stross wants us to go “ooh” and “aah” over his big plot twists (just like Cory Doctorow says he did) but I saw that shit coming a mile away and I still didn’t get much of a charge out of the ultimate source of the “evil” here.

The book features three different narrators, all of whom are nice personable types with foibles and a slight prickliness to them — two are drawn into the crime from the outside due to the weird ways various involved people act in its aftermath, the third is a Scottish policewoman investigating the whole thing. I believed in all of their voices, more or less, but mostly Sue the policewoman, but I have no idea WHY they all needed to tell the story, especially when Sue is ultimately about as important to the story as a plate of nachos. So that part is strike #1.

Strike #2 isn’t really a strike at first. Stross has a good sense for next-level type stuff — big online video games where people pretend to be spies or football hooligans, and meet up in “meatspace” (UGH OKAY THAT TERM) to fulfill some of their objections, could totally happen, as could people installing chips in their fingers to type on virtual keyboards, as maybe even could Scottish independence and EU/China/India economic dominance. But these plausible-ish “Future Shock” things rub up clumsily against others. The idea that US could so soon become a non-player in financial and political terms?: Haha I WISH! Stross’ much-flogged idea that we will all have awesome future glasses where we can get the Internet and warnings and all that? There is no way that this will happen, because people don’t like to wear glasses. He might have had me at “sub-cutaneous eyeball display chip,” but the glasses idea (first floated by Stross in Accelerando as far as I know) is just not going to work.

The marking of teenagers who have sex with other teenagers as sexual criminals for the rest of their lives…and are all ashamed about it to the point where it ruins their lives? Um, way to make hay out of some obscure Southern communities’ idiocy, but no one else agrees with any of that stuff, which is why it’s news — and as we are continually told that Europeans are better/smarter than everyone else, it is unlikely that they would swallow a law like that for as long as they have in the book. (Anyway, it’s a minor point that doesn’t even figure into the plot and is tossed off with the left hand, so we KNOW that it’s just the author talking to us directly.) So yeah, if you’re going to construct your future world, do it up right and proper instead of just relying on “OH DUDE WHAT IF THAT WERE REAL”-isme.

But Strike #3 is the worst of all. The more this future world is laid out with its cool stuff, the more I realize that Charles Stross — and Cory Doctorow and a lot of these other writers — think they’ve written science fiction if they throw in a couple cool ideas that could actually happen. There is no character development here anywhere; the actual huge controntation never actually comes, the crime is “solved” more or less accidentally, there are massive expository passages AT THE END OF THE BOOK when all we really want to do is connect with the characters…oh, it’s just not a very well-done novel at all.

And it didn’t have to be that way. The main characters are all pretty well-drawn, all three of them, considering. Everything keeps humming right along, and I love Sue’s Scots touches into her speech, like she’s just kind of re-learning everything nationalistic, and I could even get into some of the dialogue. But Stross is not interested in working on any of these things. Instead, he’s just going to go back to doing the same thing over and over, camouflaging his lack of interest in human beings themselves. Mostly, this is just a book about “modern things are about to get really cool.” But that’s not enough for a novel.

More and more, I think my lame-ass SF ideas might actually turn into a novel after all — if the bar is this low that Halting State is nominated for a Hugo Award (instead of people just going, “Hey, pretty good try guy, next time try to have the characters do something HUMAN like freak out when they hear their niece has been kidnapped by the bad guys instead of just kind of coolly realizing that she’s not really in danger after all and backing people down with the sheer force of his l337 hacker’s knowledge), then why am I not swimming in library sales RIGHT NOW?